Paper summary: A.S.E: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Security in AI-Generated Code
A.S.E is a repository-level benchmark for the security of AI-generated code; it finds that current LLMs still struggle with secure coding, and that a bigger reasoning budget doesn't reliably help.
Problem
LLMs write more and more production code, but existing security benchmarks often test isolated snippets that don’t reflect real AI-assisted programming.
Method
A.S.E (AI Code Generation Security Evaluation) is a repository-level benchmark. Tasks mirror real programming work inside actual codebases, giving a more realistic test of whether generated code introduces security problems.
Key results
From the abstract, evaluating leading LLMs:
- current LLMs still struggle with secure coding
- repository-level complexity is hard even for models that do well on snippet-level tasks
- a larger reasoning budget does not necessarily lead to better code
Limitations
There’s no dedicated limitations section in the extracted text. Results reflect the models available when the benchmark was built.
Sources
- A.S.E: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Security in AI-Generated Code (arXiv:2508.18106) — arXiv
- Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2025-09-01 — Hugging Face
- A.S.E: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Security in AI-Generated Code (arXiv HTML full text) — arXiv
- Code repository (linked in the paper) — GitHub
This is a summary written from the linked public sources. Figures and numbers are as reported there.