Paper summary: ChronoReplay: One Answer Interface Is Not Enough for Streaming Spatial Intelligence
Training a spatial VLM on one kind of answer (e.g. left/right) doesn't teach related ones (e.g. distance), which the authors call "interface lock-in"; ChronoReplay replays mixed spatial supervision as time-ordered episodes and improves three streaming benchmarks together.
Problem
The authors observe interface lock-in. Training a spatial VLM to answer which side an object is on doesn’t require keeping the metric displacement behind that answer, and distance supervision may leave categorical relations unconstrained. Gains concentrate on the trained answer format and transfer poorly to others.
Method
ChronoReplay replays heterogeneous spatial supervision as chronologically ordered episodes, keeps each source’s native targets, and balances supervision across answer families. At inference, adaptive frame selection changes which frames the model sees, without retraining.
Key results
From the abstract:
- one checkpoint improves OVO-S-Bench, OST-Bench and UCS-Bench together, including +13.41 points on OST-Bench
- same-data controls separate the ingredients: family-balanced learning beats ordinary joint SFT, and chronological replay beats a shifted-order control by about 2.41 OST points across two paired seeds
- adaptive frame selection adds further gains at lower visual cost
Limitations
There’s no dedicated limitations section in the extracted text. Some ablations use only two paired seeds.
#multimodal#spatial-reasoning#video
Sources
- ChronoReplay: One Answer Interface Is Not Enough for Streaming Spatial Intelligence (arXiv:2610.34283) — arXiv
- Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2026-10-28 — Hugging Face
- ChronoReplay: One Answer Interface Is Not Enough for Streaming Spatial Intelligence (arXiv HTML full text) — arXiv
- Code repository (linked in the paper) — GitHub
This is a summary written from the linked public sources. Figures and numbers are as reported there.